Review



microbiome data analysis  (Servicebio Inc)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 86
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Servicebio Inc microbiome data analysis
    Analysis of <t>microbial</t> <t>community</t> <t>composition</t> and diversity. ( A / B ) Species abundance bar plots of gut <t>microbiota</t> at the phylum and genus levels, respectively; ( C ) Comparison of Chao 1 index for gut microbiota diversity between groups; ( D ) Comparison of the Firmicutes -to- Bacteroidota ratio between groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; ns P > 0.05; ** P < 0.01.
    Microbiome Data Analysis, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/microbiome data analysis/product/Servicebio Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    microbiome data analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Gut microbiota-dependent protection by Lactobacillus reuteri against renal injury in brain-dead rats"

    Article Title: Gut microbiota-dependent protection by Lactobacillus reuteri against renal injury in brain-dead rats

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-47230-1

    Analysis of microbial community composition and diversity. ( A / B ) Species abundance bar plots of gut microbiota at the phylum and genus levels, respectively; ( C ) Comparison of Chao 1 index for gut microbiota diversity between groups; ( D ) Comparison of the Firmicutes -to- Bacteroidota ratio between groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; ns P > 0.05; ** P < 0.01.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Analysis of microbial community composition and diversity. ( A / B ) Species abundance bar plots of gut microbiota at the phylum and genus levels, respectively; ( C ) Comparison of Chao 1 index for gut microbiota diversity between groups; ( D ) Comparison of the Firmicutes -to- Bacteroidota ratio between groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; ns P > 0.05; ** P < 0.01.

    Techniques Used: Comparison

    Species-level inter-group microbiota differences and their immune-inflammatory correlations. ( A ) Differences in microbiota abundance at the species level between groups (data presented as mean ± SEM; *** P < 0.001; ** P < 0.01; * P < 0.05); ( B / C ) Correlation analysis of unclassified Muribaculaceae abundance with serum LPS concentration (simple linear regression; P < 0.05; Pearson r = 0.67; ( B ) and ileal gland CD25 + proportion (simple linear regression; P < 0.05; Pearson r = 0.58; ( C ) within the BD + L. reuteri group; ( D ) Correlation analysis of serum LPS concentration and renal CXCL2 + proportion (simple linear regression; P < 0.05; Pearson r = 0.63; ( D ) within the BD + L. reuteri group.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Species-level inter-group microbiota differences and their immune-inflammatory correlations. ( A ) Differences in microbiota abundance at the species level between groups (data presented as mean ± SEM; *** P < 0.001; ** P < 0.01; * P < 0.05); ( B / C ) Correlation analysis of unclassified Muribaculaceae abundance with serum LPS concentration (simple linear regression; P < 0.05; Pearson r = 0.67; ( B ) and ileal gland CD25 + proportion (simple linear regression; P < 0.05; Pearson r = 0.58; ( C ) within the BD + L. reuteri group; ( D ) Correlation analysis of serum LPS concentration and renal CXCL2 + proportion (simple linear regression; P < 0.05; Pearson r = 0.63; ( D ) within the BD + L. reuteri group.

    Techniques Used: Concentration Assay



    Similar Products

    microbiome data analysis  (Servicebio Inc)
    86
    Servicebio Inc microbiome data analysis
    Analysis of <t>microbial</t> <t>community</t> <t>composition</t> and diversity. ( A / B ) Species abundance bar plots of gut <t>microbiota</t> at the phylum and genus levels, respectively; ( C ) Comparison of Chao 1 index for gut microbiota diversity between groups; ( D ) Comparison of the Firmicutes -to- Bacteroidota ratio between groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; ns P > 0.05; ** P < 0.01.
    Microbiome Data Analysis, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/microbiome data analysis/product/Servicebio Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    microbiome data analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    microbiome analysis data  (Databank Inc)
    90
    Databank Inc microbiome analysis data
    Analysis of <t>microbial</t> <t>community</t> <t>composition</t> and diversity. ( A / B ) Species abundance bar plots of gut <t>microbiota</t> at the phylum and genus levels, respectively; ( C ) Comparison of Chao 1 index for gut microbiota diversity between groups; ( D ) Comparison of the Firmicutes -to- Bacteroidota ratio between groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; ns P > 0.05; ** P < 0.01.
    Microbiome Analysis Data, supplied by Databank Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/microbiome analysis data/product/Databank Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    microbiome analysis data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    the microbiome data analysis pipeline  (LC Sciences)
    90
    LC Sciences the microbiome data analysis pipeline
    Correlation analysis between the root <t>microbiome</t> and metabolome at the late storage time point reveals a distinct pattern in the two highly resistant genotypes vs. the susceptible genotype. ( A ) Susceptible genotype (Sus_Ck); ( B ) resistant genotype, KSG4; and ( C ) resistant genotype, KSG6. Data are mean ± standard error of 4 replicates (each replicate consists of samples obtained from two roots). An ‘X’ sign inside the rectangular boxes in the heatmap indicates p < 0.05.
    The Microbiome Data Analysis Pipeline, supplied by LC Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/the microbiome data analysis pipeline/product/LC Sciences
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    the microbiome data analysis pipeline - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    microbiome data analysis pipeline  (LC Sciences)
    90
    LC Sciences microbiome data analysis pipeline
    Correlation analysis between the root <t>microbiome</t> and metabolome at the late storage time point reveals a distinct pattern in the two highly resistant genotypes vs. the susceptible genotype. ( A ) Susceptible genotype (Sus_Ck); ( B ) resistant genotype, KSG4; and ( C ) resistant genotype, KSG6. Data are mean ± standard error of 4 replicates (each replicate consists of samples obtained from two roots). An ‘X’ sign inside the rectangular boxes in the heatmap indicates p < 0.05.
    Microbiome Data Analysis Pipeline, supplied by LC Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/microbiome data analysis pipeline/product/LC Sciences
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    microbiome data analysis pipeline - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    microbial community preliminary data analysis  (Illumina Inc)
    99
    Illumina Inc microbial community preliminary data analysis
    Correlation analysis between the root <t>microbiome</t> and metabolome at the late storage time point reveals a distinct pattern in the two highly resistant genotypes vs. the susceptible genotype. ( A ) Susceptible genotype (Sus_Ck); ( B ) resistant genotype, KSG4; and ( C ) resistant genotype, KSG6. Data are mean ± standard error of 4 replicates (each replicate consists of samples obtained from two roots). An ‘X’ sign inside the rectangular boxes in the heatmap indicates p < 0.05.
    Microbial Community Preliminary Data Analysis, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/microbial community preliminary data analysis/product/Illumina Inc
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    microbial community preliminary data analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    biostatistical microbiome data analysis  (Biostatistical Consulting)
    86
    Biostatistical Consulting biostatistical microbiome data analysis
    Correlation analysis between the root <t>microbiome</t> and metabolome at the late storage time point reveals a distinct pattern in the two highly resistant genotypes vs. the susceptible genotype. ( A ) Susceptible genotype (Sus_Ck); ( B ) resistant genotype, KSG4; and ( C ) resistant genotype, KSG6. Data are mean ± standard error of 4 replicates (each replicate consists of samples obtained from two roots). An ‘X’ sign inside the rectangular boxes in the heatmap indicates p < 0.05.
    Biostatistical Microbiome Data Analysis, supplied by Biostatistical Consulting, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/biostatistical microbiome data analysis/product/Biostatistical Consulting
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    biostatistical microbiome data analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    microbiome data analysis  (Biostatistical Consulting)
    90
    Biostatistical Consulting microbiome data analysis
    Correlation analysis between the root <t>microbiome</t> and metabolome at the late storage time point reveals a distinct pattern in the two highly resistant genotypes vs. the susceptible genotype. ( A ) Susceptible genotype (Sus_Ck); ( B ) resistant genotype, KSG4; and ( C ) resistant genotype, KSG6. Data are mean ± standard error of 4 replicates (each replicate consists of samples obtained from two roots). An ‘X’ sign inside the rectangular boxes in the heatmap indicates p < 0.05.
    Microbiome Data Analysis, supplied by Biostatistical Consulting, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/microbiome data analysis/product/Biostatistical Consulting
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    microbiome data analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    microbiome data analysis  (Novogene)
    90
    Novogene microbiome data analysis
    Correlation analysis between the root <t>microbiome</t> and metabolome at the late storage time point reveals a distinct pattern in the two highly resistant genotypes vs. the susceptible genotype. ( A ) Susceptible genotype (Sus_Ck); ( B ) resistant genotype, KSG4; and ( C ) resistant genotype, KSG6. Data are mean ± standard error of 4 replicates (each replicate consists of samples obtained from two roots). An ‘X’ sign inside the rectangular boxes in the heatmap indicates p < 0.05.
    Microbiome Data Analysis, supplied by Novogene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/microbiome data analysis/product/Novogene
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    microbiome data analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    microbiome data analysis  (Diversigen Inc)
    90
    Diversigen Inc microbiome data analysis
    Correlation analysis between the root <t>microbiome</t> and metabolome at the late storage time point reveals a distinct pattern in the two highly resistant genotypes vs. the susceptible genotype. ( A ) Susceptible genotype (Sus_Ck); ( B ) resistant genotype, KSG4; and ( C ) resistant genotype, KSG6. Data are mean ± standard error of 4 replicates (each replicate consists of samples obtained from two roots). An ‘X’ sign inside the rectangular boxes in the heatmap indicates p < 0.05.
    Microbiome Data Analysis, supplied by Diversigen Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/microbiome data analysis/product/Diversigen Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    microbiome data analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Analysis of microbial community composition and diversity. ( A / B ) Species abundance bar plots of gut microbiota at the phylum and genus levels, respectively; ( C ) Comparison of Chao 1 index for gut microbiota diversity between groups; ( D ) Comparison of the Firmicutes -to- Bacteroidota ratio between groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; ns P > 0.05; ** P < 0.01.

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Gut microbiota-dependent protection by Lactobacillus reuteri against renal injury in brain-dead rats

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-47230-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of microbial community composition and diversity. ( A / B ) Species abundance bar plots of gut microbiota at the phylum and genus levels, respectively; ( C ) Comparison of Chao 1 index for gut microbiota diversity between groups; ( D ) Comparison of the Firmicutes -to- Bacteroidota ratio between groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; ns P > 0.05; ** P < 0.01.

    Article Snippet: The microbiome data analysis was conducted by Servicebio (Wuhan, China).

    Techniques: Comparison

    Species-level inter-group microbiota differences and their immune-inflammatory correlations. ( A ) Differences in microbiota abundance at the species level between groups (data presented as mean ± SEM; *** P < 0.001; ** P < 0.01; * P < 0.05); ( B / C ) Correlation analysis of unclassified Muribaculaceae abundance with serum LPS concentration (simple linear regression; P < 0.05; Pearson r = 0.67; ( B ) and ileal gland CD25 + proportion (simple linear regression; P < 0.05; Pearson r = 0.58; ( C ) within the BD + L. reuteri group; ( D ) Correlation analysis of serum LPS concentration and renal CXCL2 + proportion (simple linear regression; P < 0.05; Pearson r = 0.63; ( D ) within the BD + L. reuteri group.

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Gut microbiota-dependent protection by Lactobacillus reuteri against renal injury in brain-dead rats

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-47230-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Species-level inter-group microbiota differences and their immune-inflammatory correlations. ( A ) Differences in microbiota abundance at the species level between groups (data presented as mean ± SEM; *** P < 0.001; ** P < 0.01; * P < 0.05); ( B / C ) Correlation analysis of unclassified Muribaculaceae abundance with serum LPS concentration (simple linear regression; P < 0.05; Pearson r = 0.67; ( B ) and ileal gland CD25 + proportion (simple linear regression; P < 0.05; Pearson r = 0.58; ( C ) within the BD + L. reuteri group; ( D ) Correlation analysis of serum LPS concentration and renal CXCL2 + proportion (simple linear regression; P < 0.05; Pearson r = 0.63; ( D ) within the BD + L. reuteri group.

    Article Snippet: The microbiome data analysis was conducted by Servicebio (Wuhan, China).

    Techniques: Concentration Assay

    Correlation analysis between the root microbiome and metabolome at the late storage time point reveals a distinct pattern in the two highly resistant genotypes vs. the susceptible genotype. ( A ) Susceptible genotype (Sus_Ck); ( B ) resistant genotype, KSG4; and ( C ) resistant genotype, KSG6. Data are mean ± standard error of 4 replicates (each replicate consists of samples obtained from two roots). An ‘X’ sign inside the rectangular boxes in the heatmap indicates p < 0.05.

    Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences

    Article Title: Root Microbiome and Metabolome Traits Associated with Improved Post-Harvest Root Storage for Sugar Beet Breeding Lines Under Southern Idaho Conditions

    doi: 10.3390/ijms252312681

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Correlation analysis between the root microbiome and metabolome at the late storage time point reveals a distinct pattern in the two highly resistant genotypes vs. the susceptible genotype. ( A ) Susceptible genotype (Sus_Ck); ( B ) resistant genotype, KSG4; and ( C ) resistant genotype, KSG6. Data are mean ± standard error of 4 replicates (each replicate consists of samples obtained from two roots). An ‘X’ sign inside the rectangular boxes in the heatmap indicates p < 0.05.

    Article Snippet: The metagenomic reads obtained from the 16S sequencing were processed using the microbiome data analysis pipeline from LC Sciences (Houston, TX, USA).

    Techniques: